tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5456713316106195869.post2700674252568542734..comments2023-10-22T06:31:50.323-07:00Comments on A Walk On The Natural Side: Dr Judith Curry and Dr. Patrick Moore demolish Michael Mann in climate debate!Jim Steelehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02652430670493741009noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5456713316106195869.post-50747362921124140392019-06-02T06:19:13.253-07:002019-06-02T06:19:13.253-07:00OK, figured out the date. A current article by Ma...OK, figured out the date. A current article by Martz and Lai on WUWT provide a link to this site and incorrectly give the date as 2019. I stand corrected. -Juan SlaytonAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5456713316106195869.post-1393925764965861162018-11-07T10:04:37.875-08:002018-11-07T10:04:37.875-08:00https://i.imgur.com/eJEFuLS.jpg
this is the big de...https://i.imgur.com/eJEFuLS.jpg<br />this is the big deal?garcadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11892814788792651844noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5456713316106195869.post-38562870560081455152018-06-13T15:58:20.984-07:002018-06-13T15:58:20.984-07:00Wlilst it’s great that we have people who point ou...Wlilst it’s great that we have people who point out the lack of correlation of rising carbon dioxide to predicted catastrophes, it still saddens me that so many prominent skeptics further the LIE that our surface temperatures are elevated by a so called radiative greenhouse effect. It becomes obvious within minutes of looking at Mars, Venus and Titan that such a theory is pure pseudoscience and that gravity and atmospheric mass are the only tools a planet has to perform work on the surface and elevate temperatures. Wicked Wench Fanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05488208056875134837noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5456713316106195869.post-90110743956405235762018-06-13T13:25:12.717-07:002018-06-13T13:25:12.717-07:00TRUMP and PRUITT get the SCIENCE RIGHT - NATURAL C...TRUMP and PRUITT get the SCIENCE RIGHT - NATURAL CYCLES DRIVE CLIMATE CHANGE. <br /><br />NATURAL CYCLES DRIVE CLIMATE CHANGE<br /><br />Climate is controlled by natural cycles. Earth is just past the 2003+/- peak of a millennial cycle and the current cooling trend will likely continue until the next Little Ice Age minimum at about 2650.See the Energy and Environment paper at http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0958305X16686488<br /> and an earlier accessible blog version at http://climatesense-norpag.blogspot.com/2017/02/the-coming-cooling-usefully-accurate_17.html<br /> Here is the abstract for convenience :<br />“ABSTRACT<br /> This paper argues that the methods used by the establishment climate science community are not fit for purpose and that a new forecasting paradigm should be adopted. Earth’s climate is the result of resonances and beats between various quasi-cyclic processes of varying wavelengths. It is not possible to forecast the future unless we have a good understanding of where the earth is in time in relation to the current phases of those different interacting natural quasi periodicities. Evidence is presented specifying the timing and amplitude of the natural 60+/- year and, more importantly, 1,000 year periodicities (observed emergent behaviors) that are so obvious in the temperature record. Data related to the solar climate driver is discussed and the solar cycle 22 low in the neutron count (high solar activity) in 1991 is identified as a solar activity millennial peak and correlated with the millennial peak -inversion point – in the RSS temperature trend in about 2003. The cyclic trends are projected forward and predict a probable general temperature decline in the coming decades and centuries. Estimates of the timing and amplitude of the coming cooling are made. If the real climate outcomes follow a trend which approaches the near term forecasts of this working hypothesis, the divergence between the IPCC forecasts and those projected by this paper will be so large by 2021 as to make the current, supposedly actionable, level of confidence in the IPCC forecasts untenable.””<br />Dr Norman Pagehttp://climatesense-norpag.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5456713316106195869.post-61120268325713992972018-06-13T09:40:07.610-07:002018-06-13T09:40:07.610-07:00Unfortunately, Dr Curry is a gatekeeper and her pr...Unfortunately, Dr Curry is a gatekeeper and her presentation is a grave disservice to skeptics in the wider scientific debate who seek to expose the more technical failings in the greenhouse gas theory per se. Clearly, her admitted poor grasp of thermodynamics serves to further muddy the waters. She certainly doesn't speak for the 1,300+ scientists at Principia Scientific International (many of whom possess PhD's in the 'hard' sciences and take a cross-disciplinary approach). On this see: ‘Controlled Opposition’ Keeps Greenhouse Gas Theory On Life Support https://principia-scientific.org/controlled-opposition-keeps-greenhouse-gas-theory-on-life-support/John O'Sullivanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04719257903632828427noreply@blogger.com