In 2002, Scripps’ esteemed
oceanographer Walter Munk argued for the establishment
of an Ocean Observation System reporting,
“much of the twentieth
century could be called a “century of undersampling” in which “physical charts
of temperature, salinity, nutrients, and currents were so unrealistic that they
could not possibly have been of any use to the biologists.
Similarly, scientists could find experimental support for their favorite theory
no matter what the theory they claimed.” Due to that undersampling MIT’s oceanographer Carl
Wunsch (2006) likewise noted, “Among the more troublesome distortions now
widely accepted, one must include the notion that the ocean circulation is a
simple “conveyor belt” and that the Gulf Stream is in danger of ‘turning off’.”
Another such
favorite theory, mistakenly offered as a fact, speculates we are now witnessing
increasing anthropogenic ocean acidification, despite never determining if
current pH trends lie within the bounds of natural variability. Claims of
acidification are based on an “accepted
scientific paradigm” that “anthropogenic
CO2
is entering
the ocean as a passive thermodynamic response to rising atmospheric CO2.”
Granted when all else is equal, higher atmospheric CO2
concentrations result in more CO2 entering the oceans and declining
pH. But the ever-changing conditions of surface waters exert far more powerful effects. Whether we examine
seasonal, multi-decadal, millennial or glacial/interglacial time frames, ocean
surfaces are rarely in equilibrium with atmospheric CO2. Relative to
atmospheric CO2, seasonal surface water can range up to 60%
oversaturated due to rising acidic deep water. Due to the biological pump, CO2
concentrations can be drawn down, leaving surface waters as much as 60% under‑saturated
(Takahashi
2002). Thus we cannot simply attribute trends in surface water pH to
equilibration with atmospheric CO2. We must first fully account for
natural ocean cycles that raise acidic waters from deeper layers and the biological
responses that pump CO2 back to ocean depths.
[note: in
this essay I use “acidic” in a relative sense. For example, although the pH of
ocean water is 7.8 at 250 meters depth and is technically alkaline, those
waters are “more acidic” relative to the surface pH of 8.1.]
To appreciate the
importance of pH altering dynamics, consider the fact that pure water has a neutral
pH of 7.0. Rainfall quickly equilibrates with atmospheric CO2, and
pH falls to ~5.5. Dark‑water rivers such as the Rio Negro drop to pH 5.1. In
contrast, due to a combination of biological activities and geochemical
buffering, the average pH of ocean surfaces (and some rivers) rises to ~8.1. In
other words, after equilibration with atmospheric CO2, powerful
factors combine to remove 99.8% of all acidifying
hydrogen ions from rainwater. The balance between upwelled acidic waters
versus carbon sequestration and export by the “biological pump” is the key factor maintaining high pH in
oceanic surface waters, and the communities of plankton that operate that pump
undergo changes on seasonal, multidecadal and millennial time scales; changes
we are just beginning to understand.
In Bates 2014, A
Time-Series View of Changing Surface Ocean Chemistry Due to Ocean Uptake of
Anthropogenic CO2 and Ocean Acidification, they simplistically argued declining ocean pH is
“consistent with rising atmospheric CO2”.
But a closer examination of each site used in their synthesis suggests their
anthropogenic attribution is likely misplaced. For example, at the Hawaiian oceanic station known as HOT, based
on 10 samplings a year since 1988, researchers reported a declining pH trend.
But that trend was not consistent
with invasions from atmospheric CO2. An earlier paper (Dore 2009) had observed, “Air-sea
CO2 fluxes, while variable, did not appear to exert an influence on
surface pH variability. For example, low fluxes of CO2 into
the sea from 1998–2002 corresponded with low pH and relatively high fluxes
during 2003–2005 were coincident with high pH; the opposite pattern would be
expected if variability in the atmospheric CO2 invasion was the
primary driver of anomalous DIC accumulation.” (DIC is the abbreviation for Dissolved
Inorganic Carbon referring to the combined components derived
from aqueous CO2, including bicarbonate and carbonate ions.)
Those higher
fluxes of CO2 into the surface likely stimulated a more efficient
biological pump resulting in higher pH.
That rise in pH is consistent with experimental evidence demonstrating CO2
is often a limiting nutrient (Riebesell
2007), and adding CO2 stimulates photosynthesis. That most
photosynthesizing plankton have CO2 concentrating mechanisms
suggests CO2 is often in chronic short supply.
The greatest
concentrations of CO2 upwell from depth to invade surface waters. As
seen below in the illustration by Byrne
2010 from the northern Pacific, the ocean’s pH (thus the store of DIC)
rapidly drops from 8.1 at the surface to 7.3 at 1000 meters depth. Dynamics
such as upwelling bring deeper waters to the surface reducing pH, while
dynamics such as the biological pump shunt carbon back to deeper depths and
raise surface pH. At the risk of
oversimplifying a myriad of complex dynamics, oceans basically undergo a
4-phase cycle that determines the average annual surface pH. Any adjustments to
this cycle will alter trends in pH over decadal to millennial time periods.
Phase 1:
Varied rates of upwelling and winter mixing raises acidic water to the sunlit
surface
and lowers pH.
Phase 2:
Specific plankton communities, largely
diatoms respond
quickly to the arrival of
nutrients in the surface waters, and
rapidly sequester and export
carbon back to depth. Phase-2 productivity also generates dissolved and
suspended organic carbon that is transported laterally to other regions. When
community photosynthesis absorbs CO2 faster than respiration
releases it or upwelling injects it, surface pH rises.
Phase 3: As
available nutrients are depleted, diatom populations dwindle and other plankton
communities dominate such as coccolithophores and photosynthesizing
bacteria. Instead of rapidly exporting carbon, this plankton community is
better at retaining and utilizing nutrients. The utilization of suspended and
dissolved organic carbon and increased grazing by populations of zooplankton
increase respiration rates relative to new photosynthesis, so pH declines.
Phase 4: A
“regional equilibrium” is established as accumulated organic carbon from
previous
phases is depleted and new, but lower, levels of productivity are
balanced by community respiration. That balance raises pH. This equilibrium is
fleeting and lasts until a new burst of nutrients reaches sunlit waters. The
supply of nutrients rising to the surface cycles seasonally as well as over
decades, millennia and glacial/interglacial intervals, so that short interval
trends are embedded in much longer trends. This is one reason why computed pH
trends by Bates 2014 statistically explained only a minor portion of pH
variability even after removing seasonal trends.
First consider
that oceans store 50 times more CO2 than the atmosphere. A small
change in the rate by which deep acidic water reaches the surface is the major
determinant of surface pH trends. Nutrients, acidity, and density increase with
depth, but not all depths contain a balanced supply of nutrients critical for
photosynthesis. To bring denser water to the surface requires a significant
input of energy that is primarily provided by the winds or tides (Wunsch
2004). Stronger winds generate more upwelling and winter mixing. Thus cycles of oceanic and atmospheric
circulation that strength and weaken winds, raise varied combinations and
concentrations of nutrients to the surface, which accordingly affects the
biological pump and pH.
For example
in temperate oceans, winter cooling of surface waters allows winds and storms
to mix surface waters with CO2 rich waters from as deep as 500
meters. This lowers surface pH, so that relatively insignificant inputs from
atmospheric CO2 are undetectable. (Takahashi
2002, 1993). Several researchers have observed significant correlations
between winter mixing and the North Atlantic Oscillation (Ullman
2009, Steinberg
2012). A positive NAO is associated with stronger westerly winds and also
correlates with a stronger subpolar gyre. Counter-clockwise gyres in the
northern hemisphere increase regional upwelling when they strengthen. So
changes in NAO-driven upwelling cause multi-decadal oscillations in the
plankton communities and pH.
In the
Pacific, El Nino years strengthen the Aleutian Low and the Pacific subpolar
gyre, similarly increasing regional upwelling. In contrast during La Nina
years, gyre upwelling decreases but trade winds speed up and intensify coastal
and equatorial upwelling. The frequency of El Niño’s vs La Niña’s varies over
40 to 60 year cycles of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation. Although periods of
increased upwelling decreases pH, due to undersampling it is not clear how this
extrapolates across the whole Pacific Basin during the 20th century.
Upwelling
also varies on millennial scales. During the Roman Warm Period, Medieval Warm
Period and the Current Warm Period, La Nina-like conditions with stronger trade
winds dominated (Salvatteci 2014)
causing above average upwelling and higher productivity. During cooler periods
like the Dark Ages and Little Ice Age, the Pacific was dominated by El
Nino-like conditions with less upwelling and lower productivity. Claims that
oceans have acidified since the Little Ice Age due to anthropogenic CO2
(Caldeira
2003) may be true, but the uncertainties are huge. It is just as likely
increased upwelling caused more acidic modern oceans, or it is equally possible
that modern oceans are less acidic if increased upwelling stimulated a
biological pump that sequestered and exported enough carbon to offset acidic
upwelling.
Global ocean
acidification is determined by averaging sink regions with out‑gassing source
regions. Opposing regional trends add significant uncertainty when determining
global calculations. As illustrated by the yellows and reds in the Martinez-Boti
(2015) illustration below, there are vast regions where so much DIC is
upwelled, on average the ocean is exhaling CO2. Regions that are net
sources of out-gassing CO2 experience lower pH solely due to
upwelling of ancient waters, and the pH is lower than predicted from simple
equilibration with the atmosphere.
Oceanic regions of outgassing CO2 sources and CO2 sinks |
Paradoxically, oceans also
experience acidification if weakening winds reduce upwelling. For example due
to changing locations and strength of the InterTropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ),
trade winds over northern Venezuela’s Cariaco Basin undergo decadal and
centennial shifts in strength. When the ITCZ moved south during the Little Ice
Age, upwelling and productivity in the Cariaco Basin declined. At the end of
the LIA, the ITCZ began moving northward and upwelling and productivity
increased (Gutierrez
2009). Recently the ITCZ moved further northward due to more La Niña’s and
the negative Pacific Decadal Oscillation, and regional winds declined.
Consequently researchers reported anomalously shallow seasonal upwelling that
brought more DIC to the surface but fewer critical nutrients that reside at
lower depths. This resulted in decreased productivity and a decrease in diatom
populations. Less productivity and less carbon export did not offset upwelled
DIC, so the regional pH declined (Astor
2013). Despite Astor serving as a co-author, Bates 2014 oddly failed to
mention this pH altering dynamic, choosing to attribute Cariaco’s declining pH
trend to rising anthropogenic CO2.
In contrast
to the Cariaco Basin, a negative
Pacific Decadal Oscillation increases upwelling along the Americas west coast, stimulating the highly
productive/high carbon-export community of phase-2. Upwelled DIC is quickly
sequestered and exported by large single-celled diatoms. With their relatively
heavy siliceous shells, dead diatoms rapidly sink carrying carbon to the sea
floor. Larger zooplankton graze on diatoms and their large fecal pellets and
carcasses also carry carbon rapidly to depth. Diatom blooms along California and Oregon spark increased
krill and anchovy populations, which attract feeding humpback whales from Costa
Rica and seabirds like the Sooty Shearwater from New Zealand, confounding any
attempts accurately measure the carbon budget.
As
illustrated in the Evans et al graph
below, coastal upwelling can over‑saturate the surface waters to 1000 matm, 2.5 times above atmospheric pCO2
(represented by dashed horizontal line). Within weeks the biological response
sequesters and exports that carbon so that concentrations of surface water CO2
fall as low as 200 matm; a
concentration that would still be under-saturated relative to the Little Ice
Age’s atmosphere. Relative to these rapid seasonal changes in pH, fears that
marine organisms cannot adapt quickly enough to the relatively slower changes
wrought by anthropogenic CO2 seem overblown.
Upwelling and the Biological pump along the Oregon Coast |
Still such
fears filter researchers’ interpretations. Along the west coast of North
America, planktonic sea snails called pteropods, begin life feeding on algal
blooms ignited by seasonal coastal upwelling. As illustrated in scanning
electron micrograph “a”, shown below from (Bednarsek
2014), pteropod shells are heavily dissolved during the first few weeks of
life due to acidic upwelled water. Picture “b” shows a larger more mature shell
with the outer part of the shell experiencing no dissolution. As the snails
matured, either upwelled acidic waters subsided or the snail was transported
seaward to less acidic waters by the same currents that promoted upwelling. The result is pteropod shell
dissolution is a very localized, short duration phenomenon.
Nonetheless
in a study sponsored by NOAA’s Ocean Acidification Program Bednarsek 2014
argued those examples of shell dissolution were caused by anthropogenic carbon
writing, “We estimate that the incidence
of severe pteropod shell dissolution owing to anthropogenic OA has doubled in
near shore habitats since pre-industrial conditions across this region and is
on track to triple by 2050.” But such “conclusions” are unsupported speculation
at best. The study failed to determine if upwelled waters were any more acidic
now than during any other seasonal or La Nina upwelling event. Most studies
suggest upwelling declined during the Little Ice Age, and the resumption of
stronger upwelling is the result of a natural cycle. But Bednarsek (2014) simply used a formula
equilibrating past and present atmospheric CO2 to compute surface water
pH. But such methodology is meaningless. No net CO2 diffusion from
the atmosphere to surface waters occurs when upwelling has oversaturated
surface pCO2, and as shown in the Evans et al graph, due to the
biological pump surface waters remained undersaturated relative to both current
and LIA atmospheric CO2. Shame on those NOAA scientists for such
biased interpretations.
Dissolution of pteropod shells from Bednarsek 2014 |
On all time frames, when upwelling
subsides and nutrients and carbon become scarce, diatom populations dwindle and
oceans transition to Phase 3. Coccolithophore and bacterial communities that
were relatively minor constituents, begin to dominate. Smaller bacteria remain
suspended in the surface layers and export much less carbon. Grazing on
increasingly abundant bacteria and accumulated organic carbon, promotes greater
zooplankton populations. As a
result, community respiration rates increase, and higher CO2
concentrations lower surface pH.
Coccolithophores |
Coccolithophores are large single-celled alga
encased by several ornate calcium-carbonate “coccoliths”, so that sinking dead
individuals do export carbon relatively quickly. However the construction of coccoliths
metabolically increases surface pCO2, lowers pH and counteracts the “biological pump”. When calcium combines
with carbonate ions to form coccoliths, the reaction releases acidifying CO2.
Likewise the growth of pteropods’ calcium carbonate shells also increases CO2.
It seems paradoxical that one of the greatest fears of ocean acidification is
the dissolution of carbonate shells, yet the very process of creating those
shells increases acidification and lowers surface alkalinity.
Several researchers
suggest coccolith formation evolved to provide much needed CO2 for
photosynthesis in under-saturated waters. Experimental evidence reveals higher
concentrations of CO2 results in lower rates of coccolith formation
but proponents of worrisome acidification argue this is evidence of
acidification’s deleterious effects. However the same response would be
expected if the rate of coccolith formation responds to the available supply of
CO2 required for photosynthesis. Furthermore if they are so
vulnerable to acidification, how did coccolithophores evolve and survive over
200 million years ago, when atmospheric CO2 was at least 2 to 3
times higher than today?
Without copious supplies of nutrients
from upwelling, productivity in subtropical gyres is much lower and diatoms
constitute a minor component of that plankton community. But they still undergo
cyclic changes. In the Atlantic, Steinberg (2012) describes a 113% decrease in
diatoms between 1990 and 2007 in contrast to stable coccolithophore populations
and a rapidly increasing community of photosynthesizing bacteria. In turn
rapidly increasing communities of small zooplankton graze on the bacteria
resulting in increased community respiration rates. Three sites from
Bates 2014 are located in subtropical gyres: HOT near Hawaii, BATS near the
Bermuda and ESTOC near the Canary Islands. And all three are exhibiting these
classic phase-3 patterns with increasing respiration rates (Lomas 2010,
Gonzalez-Davila
2003, Peligri
2005, Steinberg
2012), which accounts for declining pH trends. As shown
by Steinberg 2012, those trends are significantly correlated
with multi-decadal climate indices – the North Atlantic Oscillation plus three
different Pacific Ocean climate indices”.
Global pH decreased when oceans
transitioned from the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) to the
current interglacial Teleconnections between the Atlantic and Pacific have been
confirmed as warm
periods in the Greenland ice core correlate with periods of extended periods of
upwelling along the California coast (Ortiz 2005). Recent
research also links simultaneous multi‑millennial cycles of upwelling and
higher productivity in the sub‑Antarctic Atlantic and equatorial Pacific. Most
research suggests that at the end of the LGM, Antarctic began to warm followed
by a rise in atmospheric CO2. Although the precise mechanism of CO2
out‑gassing during the deglacial period has been under debate, there is a
growing consensus that circulation changes caused aged waters rich in nutrients
to upwell in subpolar Antarctic waters. Via oceanic tunneling, those deep
Antarctic waters also upwelled in the equatorial eastern Pacific. Using
foraminifera proxy data, the graphic below from Martinez-Boti
(2015) shows periodic upwelling of subpolar Antarctic waters (on the left in
blue) caused regional pH to decline from the LGM maximum of 8.4 to about 8.1 at
the beginning of the Holocene. Due to the biological pump and/or reduced
upwelling during the early and mid Holocene, pH rises and bounces between 8.25
and 8.15.
Based on CO2 concentrations
determined from Antarctic ice cores, Martinez‑Boti also constructed a green
“Equilibrium pH” trend indicating the surface pH if it had simply equilibrated
with atmospheric CO2.
For most of the past 20,000 years, surface waters were not in
atmospheric equilibrium and more acidic, so those regional oceans were
typically a source of out‑gassing CO2. The graphs on the right (in
red) show the same pattern for the equatorial eastern Pacific but with data
that extends further into the LGM.
Ocane pH variability over pst 20,000 years from Martinez‑Boti 2015 |
Calvo 2011 examined
ocean sediments to determine the strength of upwelling versus the biological
pump plus the relationship between diatoms and coccolithophores over the past
40,000 years. Their research found lower productivity during the LGM and lower
diatom abundance relative to coccolithopheres. As upwelling increased around
20,000 years ago so did ocean productivity and the proportion of diatoms. They
concluded upwelling enhanced the biological pump but it was “not sufficient to
counteract the return to the atmosphere of large amounts of CO2 delivered by the oceans
through an enhanced ventilation of deep water.”
Ratio of Diatoms to Coccolithophores from Calvo 2011 |
Finally examining
sediments in the eastern equatorial Pacific, Carbacos 2014 found
“a clear prevalence of dominant La Niña-like conditions during the early
Holocene, with an intense upwelling and high primary productivity.” High levels
of productivity persisted through the Holocene Optimum until productivity
dramatically declined around 5,500 years ago. Since that time Carbacos 2014
reports, “An alternation between El Niño-like and La Niña-like dominant
conditions occurred during the late Holocene, characterized by a clear trend
toward prevailing El Niño-like conditions, with a low primary productivity.”
During the past 5,000 years, that lower productivity coincided with increased
dominance of coccolithophores and declining proportions of diatoms. That
suggests the oceans have been in a phase-3 multi-millennial decline in pH
superimposed on multidecadal cycles driven by the Pacific Decadal and Atlantic
Multidecadal Oscillations.
It is also worth noting,
as seen in the graph below, throughout the Holocene changes in atmospheric CO2
did not correlate with temperature. However atmospheric CO2 did
track changing plankton communities. During the early and late Holocene,
atmospheric CO2 concentrations were relatively low and stable during
periods of high productivity with higher ratios of diatoms. When ocean
productivity crashed overall around 5,000 years ago, the proportion of CO2
producing coccolithophores increased and atmospheric CO2 likewise increased
by about 20 matm. A similar annual increase in CO2
has been observed in modern oceans and similarly attributed to increased
proportions of coccolithophores (Bates
1996).
So where are the oceans
headed? If history repeats itself, declining solar insolation will result in
less upwelling, lower productivity, a reduced biological pump and higher pH. Or
perhaps higher levels of atmospheric CO2 will increase productivity
as observed in several experiments, or perhaps rising CO2 will cause
a deleterious decline in pH? The
ubiquitous uncertainties from the current undersampling of oceans allows anyone
to “find experimental support for their favorite theory no matter what the
theory they claimed.” But I can say for sure, I would not trust any predictions
that failed to account for changes in upwelling and the various responses of
the biological pump.
Contrasting Holocene Temperatures and Atmospheric CO2 |
No comments:
Post a Comment